24
285
evidence
lufore the Supreme
* Appendix. p.
Court Commission. Sir John
Imate speaks throughout as if
it
Auffam
in whose
hands the "Creditors wished
to have the bankruptey, and
hen asked what is the date
principal questions poised by
this bankruptoy wig :-
Was it the Court or was it the creditors who ought to have controlleds Huffain!
was its
larity of
Caurk
experien
apathy
it
park of
the
of
the meeting and appointurent
creditors that
by
the creditors 25th Dcocher Appendiny f. 51.
Javer
Huffam
the
49177
just after Hupfam's appointment.
wherini Auffor
appointed with the auth
this
of
not
affer my cplanations
an the part of the
Chief ductive but it
of its bearing
Ame
mas
importance in of the
ho
principal
apportuniti for what
exchsequ My happened?
$6.
of the Creditors had
bun appointeds to posist Auffam
then they may
have
-neglected their duty; but if
they
appointed to arcist)
an Assignee who was
superceded
by the appointment of Hy
Auffa
the
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.